Cajun vs Panamanian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Cajun
Panamanian
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Cajuns
Panamanians
25.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Panamanian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,140,723 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 25.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,422,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 30.5%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cajun | Panamanian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.3% |
Range | 97.6% | 70.3% |
Mean | 34.3% | 21.6% |
Median | 29.9% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Somalia (25.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Chippewa (25.9%, a difference of 0.86%), Native/Alaskan (25.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Ute (25.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Yakama (25.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 25.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 25.2% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 25.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 25.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 25.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 25.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 25.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 26.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Slavic (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pennsylvania German (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Soviet Union | 92.0 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Russians | 91.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Austrians | 90.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 19.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 88.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 19.6% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 19.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 85.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 19.7% |
Panamanians | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 19.7% |
Slavs | 84.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 84.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 19.7% |
Canadians | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 83.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Austria | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 81.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 19.7% |