Carpatho Rusyn vs Scandinavian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Scandinavian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Scandinavians
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Scandinavian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,607,667 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,332,033 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 5.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Scandinavian |
Minimum | 0.39% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 8.8% | 36.0% |
Range | 8.4% | 33.5% |
Mean | 3.7% | 9.3% |
Median | 3.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Scandinavians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (4.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cypriot (4.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |