Carpatho Rusyn vs South American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
South American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
South Americans
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs South American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,553,439 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.39%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | South American |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 46.7% |
| Range | 74.7% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 22.7% | 20.2% |
| Median | 20.7% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and South Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |