Chickasaw vs Cree Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cree
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Cree
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cree Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,172,191 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 3.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Cree |
Minimum | 3.7% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 64.4% |
Range | 29.7% | 62.6% |
Mean | 12.7% | 17.4% |
Median | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 24.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cree by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.94%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |