Chickasaw vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Creek
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Creek
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 8.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Creek |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.0% |
| Range | 96.7% | 70.8% |
| Mean | 27.0% | 28.7% |
| Median | 23.7% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 35.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |