Chilean vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
✖
Zimbabwean
✖
Single Female Poverty
✖
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Zimbabweans
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,415,237 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.7% |
Range | 98.2% | 58.6% |
Mean | 25.9% | 18.9% |
Median | 19.9% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Cameroon (19.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |