Chinese vs Bahamian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Bahamian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Bahamians
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Bahamian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,412,919 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 81.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 43.3% |
| Range | 16.7% | 41.8% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 8.9% |
| Median | 3.3% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |