Chinese vs Immigrants from India Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from India
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from India
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,464,451 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from India |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 11.3% |
| Range | 17.8% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 4.5% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from India by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 6.0%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 6.6%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 7.2%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 12.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |