Chinese vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Navajo
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chinese
Navajo
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,444,505 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 155.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Navajo |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 58.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.6% | 96.3% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 40.5% |
| Median | 10.7% | 38.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 50.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 28.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 23.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Pima (29.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |