Chippewa vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from El Salvador
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from El Salvador
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,239,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 70.6% | 30.5% |
| Range | 65.9% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 11.1% |
| Median | 14.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from El Salvador by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Blackfeet (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |