Chippewa vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Luxembourgers
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 40.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 34.1% | 15.5% |
| Range | 32.9% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 3.7% |
| Median | 5.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |