Costa Rican vs Celtic Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Celtic
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Celtics
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
47.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Celtic Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,829,630 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.8% | 99.8% |
Mean | 10.2% | 14.6% |
Median | 9.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Celtics by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |