Costa Rican vs Taiwanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Taiwanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Taiwanese
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Taiwanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,695,393 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 45.8% | 33.0% |
| Range | 42.4% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 12.8% |
| Median | 11.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Taiwanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |