Creek vs Cuban Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Cuban
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Cubans
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Cuban Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,192,797 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 21.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Cuban |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 43.1% |
| Range | 72.7% | 40.8% |
| Mean | 31.3% | 18.2% |
| Median | 28.4% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Panama (17.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Micronesia (18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.62%), Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
| German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |