Cypriot vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Cypriot
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Cypriots
Bhutanese
8.9%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,805,635 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 3.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 22.2% | 32.4% |
| Range | 21.5% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 10.2% |
| Median | 5.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Okinawan (8.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bulgarian (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (8.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |