Czech vs Creek Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Czech
Creek
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Czechs
Creek
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Creek Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,035,895 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,951,590 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 56.0%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Creek |
Minimum | 0.42% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 90.0% |
Range | 59.0% | 83.7% |
Mean | 13.9% | 30.0% |
Median | 12.8% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 19.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 38.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 15.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ute (21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Dutch West Indian (21.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.1% |