Czech vs Croatian Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Croatian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Croatians
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Croatian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,408,527 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,543,328 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Croatian |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 34.6% | 32.2% |
| Range | 33.7% | 31.2% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 10.0% |
| Median | 9.5% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Croatians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |