English vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
English
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
English
Zimbabweans
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,651,479 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.96%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 61.6% | 18.8% |
| Range | 58.1% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 8.1% |
| Median | 10.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to English and Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from North America (10.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Irish (10.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Belgium (10.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Dutch (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |