Ethiopian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ethiopians
Slavs
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,230,982 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 4.8%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Slavic |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 45.6% | 80.7% |
Range | 43.5% | 80.2% |
Mean | 16.3% | 23.6% |
Median | 15.5% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Hungarian (16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and White/Caucasian (16.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |