French American Indian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,081,352 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 41.4%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	French American Indian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	2.5%	0.83%
Maximum	66.1%	42.3%
Range	63.6%	41.4%
Mean	24.1%	12.6%
Median	22.5%	10.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	17.1%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.3%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.2%	5.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.4%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.2%	7.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Liberian (19.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Ecuadorian (19.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.4 /100 \| #244	Tragic 18.9%
Cree	0.4 /100 \| #245	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.4 /100 \| #246	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #247	Tragic 19.0%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.0%
Alsatians	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.2 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
French American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.2 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.3%
Liberians	0.2 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Ecuadorians	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Potawatomi	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Asians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.5%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%