Ghanaian vs Italian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Italian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ghanaians
Italians
13.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Italian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,869,684 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,306,770 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Italian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 35.8% | 41.2% |
Range | 33.9% | 40.1% |
Mean | 14.5% | 13.1% |
Median | 13.1% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Italians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are European (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Lebanese (13.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Slavic (13.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Haitian (13.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Senegalese (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Swedish (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Zimbabwean (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |