Greek vs Luxembourger Female Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Luxembourger
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Luxembourgers
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Luxembourger Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,170,203 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,645,818 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.82%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 19.8% |
| Range | 99.2% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 7.9% |
| Median | 9.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Luxembourgers by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |