Guamanian/Chamorro vs Colombian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Colombian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Colombians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Colombian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,235,280 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.67%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Colombian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 20.5% |
Range | 98.8% | 16.5% |
Mean | 17.2% | 12.9% |
Median | 11.7% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Colombians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |