Immigrants from Africa vs Tsimshian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Tsimshian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Tsimshian
13.4%
POVERTY
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Tsimshian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,948,524 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 24.7% |
Range | 51.8% | 17.4% |
Mean | 17.1% | 13.9% |
Median | 13.7% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Tsimshian by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from Micronesia (13.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Alsatian (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), American (13.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.82%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.98%), Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |