Immigrants from Argentina vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Yugoslavians
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,332,384 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 32.3% | 30.2% |
Range | 30.4% | 28.2% |
Mean | 12.9% | 12.4% |
Median | 11.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |