Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,016,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Cabo Verde	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.81%	1.7%
Maximum	13.1%	17.6%
Range	12.3%	16.0%
Mean	5.2%	7.8%
Median	4.7%	7.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.8%	5.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.6%	9.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.8%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.7%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.7%	3.3%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	35.8 /100 \| #184	Fair 5.3%
Americans	35.4 /100 \| #185	Fair 5.3%
Hungarians	34.7 /100 \| #186	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Albania	33.8 /100 \| #187	Fair 5.3%
Israelis	33.1 /100 \| #188	Fair 5.3%
South American Indians	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 5.3%
Ugandans	31.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	30.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 5.3%
Cape Verdeans	30.7 /100 \| #192	Fair 5.3%
Malaysians	29.5 /100 \| #193	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Israel	27.8 /100 \| #194	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Azores	27.5 /100 \| #195	Fair 5.4%
Spaniards	27.4 /100 \| #196	Fair 5.4%
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%