Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Oceania
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 30.3% |
Range | 14.0% | 29.6% |
Mean | 9.0% | 10.9% |
Median | 9.2% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |