Immigrants from China vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 17.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Icelander
Minimum	1.1%	3.8%
Maximum	24.4%	30.0%
Range	23.3%	26.2%
Mean	12.0%	15.0%
Median	11.4%	13.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	9.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	20.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	7.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%

Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Venezuelan (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Jordan	87.2 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.6%
Canadians	87.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Peru	86.6 /100 \| #143	Excellent 15.6%
Israelis	86.3 /100 \| #144	Excellent 15.6%
Welsh	85.4 /100 \| #145	Excellent 15.6%
Samoans	84.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 15.7%
Slavs	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 15.7%
Icelanders	82.4 /100 \| #148	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	80.9 /100 \| #149	Excellent 15.8%
Immigrants \| Albania	80.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent 15.8%
Venezuelans	80.1 /100 \| #151	Excellent 15.8%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	79.4 /100 \| #152	Good 15.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	78.5 /100 \| #153	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
Syrians	76.7 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%