Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Barbados Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,761,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 27.4%.

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.30%).