Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Israel
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Israel
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,930,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Israel |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 24.3% | 37.1% |
| Range | 22.4% | 36.6% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 10.2% |
| Median | 9.8% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Israel by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |