Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Egypt Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Egypt
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Egypt
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Egypt Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,395,375 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,387,558 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Immigrants from Egypt |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 48.4% | 55.9% |
Range | 46.1% | 55.1% |
Mean | 11.2% | 13.5% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 16.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Egypt by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |