Immigrants from Egypt vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Immigrants from South Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Immigrants from South Africa
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,387,558 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,245,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.070%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 0.78% | 0.91% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 44.9% |
Range | 55.1% | 44.0% |
Mean | 13.5% | 11.5% |
Median | 10.7% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from South Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |