Immigrants from Eritrea vs Japanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eritrea
Japanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eritrea
Japanese
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eritrea vs Japanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,846,826 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,060,032 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eritrea | Japanese |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 45.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.6% | 95.9% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 21.0% |
| Median | 13.6% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eritrea and Japanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.31%), American (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |