Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Ukrainian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Ukrainian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Ukrainians
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Ukrainian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,222,797 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,822,135 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Ukrainian |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 16.8% |
| Maximum | 33.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.3% | 83.2% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 36.2% |
| Median | 19.0% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 50.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 31.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 25.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Ukrainians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cameroon (19.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Sierra Leonean (19.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |