Immigrants from Europe vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Europe
Pima
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Europe
Pima
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Europe vs Pima Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,272,896 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 95.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Europe | Pima |
Minimum | 2.1% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 29.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.9% | 89.0% |
Mean | 14.1% | 41.2% |
Median | 12.6% | 34.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 57.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 36.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 25.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |