Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Kenyan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Kenyan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Kenyans
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Kenyan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,495,550 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,574,201 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Kenyan |
Minimum | 0.53% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 18.8% |
Range | 10.8% | 18.3% |
Mean | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kenyans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |