Immigrants from Indonesia vs Jordanian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Jordanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Jordanians
11.5%
POVERTY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Jordanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,732,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,402,418 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Jordanian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 21.3% |
Range | 36.0% | 18.7% |
Mean | 10.8% | 10.3% |
Median | 9.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Jordanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), English (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |