Immigrants from Ireland vs Sri Lankan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Sri Lankan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Sri Lankans
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
72.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Sri Lankan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,104,626 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,204,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 24.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 0.56% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 36.6% |
Range | 25.9% | 35.6% |
Mean | 4.7% | 6.8% |
Median | 3.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.64%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |