Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Indonesia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from Indonesia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from Indonesia
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Indonesia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,961,688 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,706,539 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Immigrants from Indonesia |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.67% |
Maximum | 37.4% | 45.9% |
Range | 37.0% | 45.2% |
Mean | 11.1% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Indonesia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |