Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from South Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from South Africa
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,738,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 1.8%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 30.8% |
Range | 37.9% | 29.4% |
Mean | 7.8% | 8.3% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from South Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |