Immigrants from Israel vs South American Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
South American
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
South Americans
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs South American Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,801,903 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,067,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.010%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | South American |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 27.8% |
| Range | 54.7% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 11.5% |
| Median | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and South Americans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |