Immigrants from Italy vs English Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,629,971 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,080,494 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 2.3%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Italy	English
Minimum	2.2%	2.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	97.8%	97.2%
Mean	30.1%	26.1%
Median	13.2%	16.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.3%	11.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	46.5%	29.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	39.2%	17.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	36.0%	24.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	34.8%	24.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and English by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from North America (14.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (14.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Africa (14.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Croatia (14.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from France (14.7%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Chilean (14.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| North America	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Italy	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.6%
Argentineans	96.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| South Africa	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Croatia	96.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| France	95.8 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.7%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| Belarus	95.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 14.7%
British	95.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 14.7%
Dutch	95.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	95.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 14.8%
Romanians	95.0 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	94.9 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| England	94.8 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 14.8%
Basques	94.7 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 14.8%
Serbians	94.5 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 14.8%
Chileans	94.4 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 14.8%
Jordanians	94.2 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 14.8%
Tlingit-Haida	94.1 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 14.9%
English	93.5 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 14.9%