Immigrants from Japan vs Argentinean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Argentinean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Argentineans
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Argentinean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,522,478 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,674,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 54.2% |
| Range | 90.6% | 51.2% |
| Mean | 26.7% | 18.7% |
| Median | 15.1% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.3% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Argentineans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.89%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |