Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Luxembourger Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Luxembourger
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Luxembourgers
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Luxembourger Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,423,008 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 15.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 17.8% |
| Range | 23.7% | 16.3% |
| Mean | 9.8% | 6.7% |
| Median | 9.7% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |