Immigrants from Latvia vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Choctaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Choctaw
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,119,330 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 39.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 9.9% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 48.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 38.7% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 17.7% | 30.9% |
| Median | 14.1% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 20.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 20.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |