Immigrants from Malaysia vs Yup'ik Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Yup'ik
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Yup'ik
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Yup'ik Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,207,874 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%, a difference of 37.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 5.0% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 32.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.5% | 97.1% |
Mean | 17.2% | 36.3% |
Median | 17.6% | 30.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 42.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 22.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 25.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 24.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |