Immigrants from Mexico vs Comanche Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Comanche
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Comanche
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Comanche Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,948,318 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,354,794 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 25.6%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Comanche |
Minimum | 11.1% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.2% |
Range | 88.9% | 67.8% |
Mean | 37.1% | 34.6% |
Median | 29.3% | 29.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 47.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.2% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Comanche by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |