Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Immigrants from Dominica
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Immigrants from Dominica
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,228,632 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Immigrants from Dominica |
Minimum | 6.7% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 54.5% |
Range | 93.3% | 52.1% |
Mean | 27.4% | 18.0% |
Median | 21.1% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.0% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.2% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.1% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Dominica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |