Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants
9.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
6.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,589,197 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,663,107 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants |
Minimum | 4.2% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 61.7% |
Range | 22.1% | 56.2% |
Mean | 11.0% | 10.8% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), American (9.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |