Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,156,358 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 20.8%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Northern Africa	Turkish
Minimum	2.0%	0.78%
Maximum	44.8%	16.2%
Range	42.8%	15.5%
Mean	9.0%	4.6%
Median	5.7%	3.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.8%	2.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.9%	4.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.2%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.5%	3.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.4%	3.5%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%
Paraguayans	61.5 /100 \| #166	Good 5.1%
Costa Ricans	61.5 /100 \| #167	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	54.9 /100 \| #168	Average 5.2%
Ottawa	54.5 /100 \| #169	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Argentina	54.4 /100 \| #170	Average 5.2%
Bermudans	52.9 /100 \| #171	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	51.3 /100 \| #172	Average 5.2%
Alsatians	51.2 /100 \| #173	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 5.2%
Marshallese	47.9 /100 \| #175	Average 5.2%
Menominee	47.8 /100 \| #176	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	45.1 /100 \| #177	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	44.9 /100 \| #178	Average 5.2%
Spanish	41.4 /100 \| #179	Average 5.3%

Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%